Monday, 24 October 2011

Selling Yourself - a brief overview

Today we looked at some of the 'Selling Yourself' television programme which concerned five candidates vying for their dream job (in this case, advertising.)

We watched Mohammed, Claire, Alex, Mili and Sarah present information about themselves, reflect on their performances, work in small groups and pitch their ideas in the form of an individual presentation.

We looked at the positive and the negative aspects of each presenter and your input was very helpful.

This will set us up nicely for tomorrow's class on effective and ineffective presentation techniques.

See you then,

Mark

7 comments:

  1. A very interesting class today. Not that I know anything about what makes a good marketing executive but I would have employed Alex over Mili. Whats even more surprising is that the advertising firm thought it money well spent to bring in so called rectruitment experts to tell them who to employ. Surely they would have been better saving their money and just asking a couple of people who are currently doing a similar role to the advertised position what they thought. Surely they know better than two random consultants? See you all tomorrow. Andrew

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mark Hetherington24 October 2011 at 07:43

    Yes, I am inclined to agree on the 'random consultants' comment. You could say though, that they are completely impartial and that could be a bonus for the advertising company. However, I do think that employees doing, or who have knowledge of the vocation would have more gravitas. Thanks for your comments. Mark

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do think there always is good to have somebody who would have the sharp question, or comment, to see how the candidate react. On the end You would less enjoy to work in place where somebody was nasty to you during interview.
    Also if they are making so much money, let them spend it. That's why we earn isn't ? to pay other people to do our job. Isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. A nasty panel member (or consultant in this case) is much more likely to attract higher viewing figures on a show like this. I wouldn't be surprised if the production company in charge of that programme had told that woman to play up to the cameras a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agreed, Lloyd. Isn't that what reality TV is all about, hamming it up for the cameras? Kenna

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very true Kenna, plus the idea that a woman that mean couldn't exist in reality helps me to get to sleep at night...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mark Hetherington27 October 2011 at 14:06

    Lloyd, you really make me smile with your comments. I think a career on the stage could help fund your studies at Uni. If you need a manager look no further than Mr H in room 121.1! Wonderful banter. See you all next week.

    ReplyDelete